Sybase NNTP forums - End Of Life (EOL)

The NNTP forums from Sybase - forums.sybase.com - are now closed.

All new questions should be directed to the appropriate forum at the SAP Community Network (SCN).

Individual products have links to the respective forums on SCN, or you can go to SCN and search for your product in the search box (upper right corner) to find your specific developer center.

Q: Team dev with PowerDynamo 3.0 and 3.5

4 posts in General Discussion (old) Last posting was on 2000-03-15 17:45:07.0Z
Erik Toft Posted on 2000-03-10 20:13:12.0Z
Newsgroups: sybase.public.easerver
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:13:12 -0600
From: Erik Toft <etoft@frontierast.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Q: Team dev with PowerDynamo 3.0 and 3.5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 24
NNTP-Posting-Host: gateway.frontierast.com 207.136.162.226
Message-ID: <347_38C95758.3E8F348F@frontierast.com>
Path: forums-1-dub!forums-1-dub!forums-master.sybase.com!forums.sybase.com
Xref: forums-1-dub sybase.public.easerver:26628
Article PK: 157631

Background...  I recently joined a development effort on a PowerDynamo dynamic file based WEB site.  Being new to PD, I installed PD 3.5.  All of the other guys are on PD 3.0.  We are using MKS for our source control.  After creating my development sandbox (an MKS thing), I created a connection profile to point to the directory, and requested to connect to it.  It told me that the WEB had been created by an earlier version of PD and that the system directory would be saved as system2.0 and replaced.

My question is...  If I modify any of the project files, and check them in, will they be compatible with the older version of PD?  So far there have been no problems, but I would like some assurance that we won't happen across any incompatibilities as we move forward.

Thanks for any assistance.

Erik T.


Carson Hager[Team Sybase] Posted on 2000-03-15 03:08:20.0Z
Newsgroups: sybase.public.easerver
From: chager@dyn-data.com (Carson Hager[Team Sybase])
Subject: Re: Q: Team dev with PowerDynamo 3.0 and 3.5
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 03:08:20 GMT
Organization: Dynamic Data Solutions, Inc.
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Lines: 50
NNTP-Posting-Host: charon.lifescape.com 63.86.26.130
Message-ID: <347_38cefe83.122760520@forums.sybase.com>
References: <347_38C95758.3E8F348F@frontierast.com>
Path: forums-1-dub!forums-1-dub!forums-master.sybase.com!forums.sybase.com
Xref: forums-1-dub sybase.public.easerver:26404
Article PK: 157073

I'm really surprised that any of the PD 2.0 folks were able to use the
site after you performed the upgrade. Or did you only upgrade your
copy of the files?


Carson

___________________________________________________________

Carson Hager
Team Sybase
Dynamic Data Solutions, Inc.
Enterprise Application Studio 3.0 Consulting and Training
http://www.dyn-data.com

DDS is now hiring EAServer consultants
to support its exploding EAServer business!
Please submit your resume to
hr@dyn-data.com!


On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:13:12 -0600, Erik Toft <etoft@frontierast.com>

wrote:

><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
><html>
>Background...&nbsp; I recently joined a development effort on a PowerDynamo
>dynamic file based WEB site.&nbsp; Being new to PD, I installed PD 3.5.&nbsp;
>All of the other guys are on PD 3.0.&nbsp; We are using MKS for our source
>control.&nbsp; After creating my development sandbox (an MKS thing), I
>created a connection profile to point to the directory, and requested to
>connect to it.&nbsp; It told me that the WEB had been created by an earlier
>version of PD and that the system directory would be saved as system2.0
>and replaced.
><p>My question is...&nbsp; If I modify any of the project files, and check
>them in, will they be compatible with the older version of PD?&nbsp; So
>far there have been no problems, but I would like some assurance that we
>won't happen across any incompatibilities as we move forward.
><p>Thanks for any assistance.
><p>Erik T.</html>
>

___________________________________________________________

Carson Hager
Team Sybase
Dynamic Data Solutions, Inc.
Enterprise Application Studio 3.0 Consulting and Training

DDS Enterprise Application Framework
Available Now as Open Source!
http://www.dyn-data.com


Erik Toft Posted on 2000-03-15 14:32:54.0Z
Newsgroups: sybase.public.easerver
From: "Erik Toft" <etoft@globalcrossing.com>
Subject: Re: Q: Team dev with PowerDynamo 3.0 and 3.5
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 08:32:54 -0600
Lines: 80
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
NNTP-Posting-Host: gateway.frontierast.com 207.136.162.226
Message-ID: <347_p9QHAvoj$GA.261@forums.sybase.com>
References: <347_38C95758.3E8F348F@frontierast.com> <347_38cefe83.122760520@forums.sybase.com>
Path: forums-1-dub!forums-1-dub!forums-master.sybase.com!forums.sybase.com
Xref: forums-1-dub sybase.public.easerver:26381
Article PK: 157050

Well, that is part of what I find perplexing...It backed up the system
directory as system2.0, but the other guys are using PD 3.0. Shouldn't the
back up directory at least be labeled system3.0?

My local copy (the MKS sandbox) is where the system directory was upgraded.
I have not put those new system files back into the group repository
archive, as I did not know what, if any incompatibilities existed (I assumed
there were some due to the upgrade).

I have made changes to .stm files and .ssc files and checked them back in.
Those changes have not yet adversely affected anyone. Am I courting
potential catastrophe? What potential incompatibilities should I look for?
Do we need to a) find a copy of PD 3.0 for me, or b) buy everyone else a
copy of PD 3.5?

As usual, thanks for the help Carson!

Erik T.

Carson Hager[Team Sybase] wrote in message
<38cefe83.122760520@forums.sybase.com>...
>I'm really surprised that any of the PD 2.0 folks were able to use the
>site after you performed the upgrade. Or did you only upgrade your
>copy of the files?
>
>
>Carson
>
>___________________________________________________________
>
>Carson Hager
>Team Sybase
>Dynamic Data Solutions, Inc.
>Enterprise Application Studio 3.0 Consulting and Training
>http://www.dyn-data.com
>
> DDS is now hiring EAServer consultants
> to support its exploding EAServer business!
> Please submit your resume to
> hr@dyn-data.com!
>
>
>On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:13:12 -0600, Erik Toft <etoft@frontierast.com>
>wrote:
>
>><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
>><html>
>>Background...&nbsp; I recently joined a development effort on a
PowerDynamo
>>dynamic file based WEB site.&nbsp; Being new to PD, I installed PD
3.5.&nbsp;
>>All of the other guys are on PD 3.0.&nbsp; We are using MKS for our source
>>control.&nbsp; After creating my development sandbox (an MKS thing), I
>>created a connection profile to point to the directory, and requested to
>>connect to it.&nbsp; It told me that the WEB had been created by an
earlier
>>version of PD and that the system directory would be saved as system2.0
>>and replaced.
>><p>My question is...&nbsp; If I modify any of the project files, and check
>>them in, will they be compatible with the older version of PD?&nbsp; So
>>far there have been no problems, but I would like some assurance that we
>>won't happen across any incompatibilities as we move forward.
>><p>Thanks for any assistance.
>><p>Erik T.</html>
>>
>
>
>___________________________________________________________
>
>Carson Hager
>Team Sybase
>Dynamic Data Solutions, Inc.
>Enterprise Application Studio 3.0 Consulting and Training
>
> DDS Enterprise Application Framework
> Available Now as Open Source!
> http://www.dyn-data.com
>


Carson Hager[Team Sybase] Posted on 2000-03-15 17:45:07.0Z
Newsgroups: sybase.public.easerver
From: chager@dyn-data.com (Carson Hager[Team Sybase])
Subject: Re: Q: Team dev with PowerDynamo 3.0 and 3.5
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 17:45:07 GMT
Organization: Dynamic Data Solutions, Inc.
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Lines: 103
NNTP-Posting-Host: charon.lifescape.com 63.86.26.130
Message-ID: <347_38cfcbe5.175338062@forums.sybase.com>
References: <347_38C95758.3E8F348F@frontierast.com> <347_38cefe83.122760520@forums.sybase.com> <347_p9QHAvoj$GA.261@forums.sybase.com>
Path: forums-1-dub!forums-1-dub!forums-master.sybase.com!forums.sybase.com
Xref: forums-1-dub sybase.public.easerver:26357
Article PK: 157025

Erik,

I thought that the other folks were on 2.0. Since they're on 3.0,
they should be fine. The major difference is the EJB instantiation
methods.


Carson

___________________________________________________________

Carson Hager
Team Sybase
Dynamic Data Solutions, Inc.
Enterprise Application Studio 3.0 Consulting and Training
http://www.dyn-data.com

DDS is now hiring EAServer consultants
to support its exploding EAServer business!
Please submit your resume to
hr@dyn-data.com!


On Wed, 15 Mar 2000 08:32:54 -0600, "Erik Toft"

<etoft@globalcrossing.com> wrote:

>Well, that is part of what I find perplexing...It backed up the system
>directory as system2.0, but the other guys are using PD 3.0. Shouldn't the
>back up directory at least be labeled system3.0?
>
>My local copy (the MKS sandbox) is where the system directory was upgraded.
>I have not put those new system files back into the group repository
>archive, as I did not know what, if any incompatibilities existed (I assumed
>there were some due to the upgrade).
>
>I have made changes to .stm files and .ssc files and checked them back in.
>Those changes have not yet adversely affected anyone. Am I courting
>potential catastrophe? What potential incompatibilities should I look for?
>Do we need to a) find a copy of PD 3.0 for me, or b) buy everyone else a
>copy of PD 3.5?
>
>As usual, thanks for the help Carson!
>
>Erik T.
>
>Carson Hager[Team Sybase] wrote in message
><38cefe83.122760520@forums.sybase.com>...
>>I'm really surprised that any of the PD 2.0 folks were able to use the
>>site after you performed the upgrade. Or did you only upgrade your
>>copy of the files?
>>
>>
>>Carson
>>
>>___________________________________________________________
>>
>>Carson Hager
>>Team Sybase
>>Dynamic Data Solutions, Inc.
>>Enterprise Application Studio 3.0 Consulting and Training
>>http://www.dyn-data.com
>>
>> DDS is now hiring EAServer consultants
>> to support its exploding EAServer business!
>> Please submit your resume to
>> hr@dyn-data.com!
>>
>>
>>On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 14:13:12 -0600, Erik Toft <etoft@frontierast.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
>>><html>
>>>Background...&nbsp; I recently joined a development effort on a
>PowerDynamo
>>>dynamic file based WEB site.&nbsp; Being new to PD, I installed PD
>3.5.&nbsp;
>>>All of the other guys are on PD 3.0.&nbsp; We are using MKS for our source
>>>control.&nbsp; After creating my development sandbox (an MKS thing), I
>>>created a connection profile to point to the directory, and requested to
>>>connect to it.&nbsp; It told me that the WEB had been created by an
>earlier
>>>version of PD and that the system directory would be saved as system2.0
>>>and replaced.
>>><p>My question is...&nbsp; If I modify any of the project files, and check
>>>them in, will they be compatible with the older version of PD?&nbsp; So
>>>far there have been no problems, but I would like some assurance that we
>>>won't happen across any incompatibilities as we move forward.
>>><p>Thanks for any assistance.
>>><p>Erik T.</html>
>>>
>>
>>
>>___________________________________________________________
>>
>>Carson Hager
>>Team Sybase
>>Dynamic Data Solutions, Inc.
>>Enterprise Application Studio 3.0 Consulting and Training
>>
>> DDS Enterprise Application Framework
>> Available Now as Open Source!
>> http://www.dyn-data.com
>>
>
>

___________________________________________________________

Carson Hager
Team Sybase
Dynamic Data Solutions, Inc.
Enterprise Application Studio 3.0 Consulting and Training

DDS Enterprise Application Framework
Available Now as Open Source!
http://www.dyn-data.com