Sybase NNTP forums - End Of Life (EOL)

The NNTP forums from Sybase - forums.sybase.com - are now closed.

All new questions should be directed to the appropriate forum at the SAP Community Network (SCN).

Individual products have links to the respective forums on SCN, or you can go to SCN and search for your product in the search box (upper right corner) to find your specific developer center.

ASE15.0.3: is my ASE suitable for installing this EBF?

5 posts in General Discussion Last posting was on 2011-08-05 03:49:04.0Z
Henry Posted on 2011-07-29 09:02:30.0Z
Sender: 1fe8.4e3276c3.1804289383@sybase.com
From: Henry
Newsgroups: sybase.public.ase.general
Subject: ASE15.0.3: is my ASE suitable for installing this EBF?
X-Mailer: WebNews to Mail Gateway v1.1t
Message-ID: <4e327726.2011.1681692777@sybase.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 10.22.241.41
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 10.22.241.41
Date: 29 Jul 2011 02:02:30 -0700
X-Trace: forums-1-dub 1311930150 10.22.241.41 (29 Jul 2011 02:02:30 -0700)
X-Original-Trace: 29 Jul 2011 02:02:30 -0700, 10.22.241.41
Lines: 14
Path: forums-1-dub!not-for-mail
Xref: forums-1-dub sybase.public.ase.general:30410
Article PK: 72588

Just received a vulnerability alert today:
http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1094235

My ASE is version 15.0.3 on a Win32.
In the EBF list, there is only one suitable, but it says
it's for ASE 15.0.3 ESD#4. I don't know what ESD#4 means.

If I execute select @@version on my ASE server, it displays:
"Adaptive Server Enterprise/15.0.3/EBF 16550 ESD#1/P/NT
(IX86)/Windows 2003/ase1503/2680/32-bit/OPT/Thu Mar 05
00:21:40 2009"
Does that mean my ASE is 15.0.3 ESD#1?

So, is my ASE suitable for installing this EBF?


Rob V [ Sybase ] Posted on 2011-07-29 10:06:19.0Z
From: "Rob V [ Sybase ]" <rob@DO.NOT.SPAM.sypron.nl.REMOVE.THIS.DECOY>
Reply-To: rob@DO.NOT.SPAM.sypron.nl.REMOVE.THIS.DECOY
Organization: Sypron BV / TeamSybase / Sybase
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sybase.public.ase.general
Subject: Re: ASE15.0.3: is my ASE suitable for installing this EBF?
References: <4e327726.2011.1681692777@sybase.com>
In-Reply-To: <4e327726.2011.1681692777@sybase.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: vip152.sybase.com
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: vip152.sybase.com
Message-ID: <4e32861b$1@forums-1-dub>
Date: 29 Jul 2011 03:06:19 -0700
X-Trace: forums-1-dub 1311933979 10.22.241.152 (29 Jul 2011 03:06:19 -0700)
X-Original-Trace: 29 Jul 2011 03:06:19 -0700, vip152.sybase.com
Lines: 40
Path: forums-1-dub!not-for-mail
Xref: forums-1-dub sybase.public.ase.general:30412
Article PK: 72591


On 29-Jul-2011 11:02, Henry wrote:
> Just received a vulnerability alert today:
> http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1094235
>
> My ASE is version 15.0.3 on a Win32.
> In the EBF list, there is only one suitable, but it says
> it's for ASE 15.0.3 ESD#4. I don't know what ESD#4 means.
>
> If I execute select @@version on my ASE server, it displays:
> "Adaptive Server Enterprise/15.0.3/EBF 16550 ESD#1/P/NT
> (IX86)/Windows 2003/ase1503/2680/32-bit/OPT/Thu Mar 05
> 00:21:40 2009"
> Does that mean my ASE is 15.0.3 ESD#1?
>
> So, is my ASE suitable for installing this EBF?

Yes, your current ASE version is 15.0.3 ESD1. The EBF number in between
(16550) is a unique number for every patch or release (i.e. 15.0.3 ESD#1
on Linux would have a different EBF number).

And yes, you can install 15.0.3 esd#4 on top of 15.0.3 esd#1.

HTH,

Rob V.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Rob Verschoor

Certified Sybase Professional DBA for ASE 15.0/12.5/12.0/11.5/11.0
and Replication Server 15.0.1/12.5 // TeamSybase

Author of Sybase books (order online at www.sypron.nl/shop):
"Tips, Tricks& Recipes for Sybase ASE" (ASE 15 edition)
"The Complete Sybase ASE Quick Reference Guide"
"The Complete Sybase Replication Server Quick Reference Guide"

rob@NO.SPAM.sypron.nl | www.sypron.nl | Twitter: @rob_verschoor
Sypron B.V., The Netherlands | Chamber of Commerce 27138666
-----------------------------------------------------------------


Sherlock, Kevin [TeamSybase] Posted on 2011-07-29 14:03:42.0Z
From: "Sherlock, Kevin [TeamSybase]" <kevin.sherlock@teamsybase.com>
Newsgroups: sybase.public.ase.general
References: <4e327726.2011.1681692777@sybase.com>
Subject: Re: ASE15.0.3: is my ASE suitable for installing this EBF?
Lines: 20
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
NNTP-Posting-Host: vip152.sybase.com
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: vip152.sybase.com
Message-ID: <4e32bdbe$1@forums-1-dub>
Date: 29 Jul 2011 07:03:42 -0700
X-Trace: forums-1-dub 1311948222 10.22.241.152 (29 Jul 2011 07:03:42 -0700)
X-Original-Trace: 29 Jul 2011 07:03:42 -0700, vip152.sybase.com
X-Authenticated-User: teamsybase
Path: forums-1-dub!not-for-mail
Xref: forums-1-dub sybase.public.ase.general:30413
Article PK: 72593

Yes, you can safely apply ESD4 over ESD1. For a definition of release
terms, http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1092204 for example.

<Henry> wrote in message news:4e327726.2011.1681692777@sybase.com...
> Just received a vulnerability alert today:
> http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1094235
>
> My ASE is version 15.0.3 on a Win32.
> In the EBF list, there is only one suitable, but it says
> it's for ASE 15.0.3 ESD#4. I don't know what ESD#4 means.
>
> If I execute select @@version on my ASE server, it displays:
> "Adaptive Server Enterprise/15.0.3/EBF 16550 ESD#1/P/NT
> (IX86)/Windows 2003/ase1503/2680/32-bit/OPT/Thu Mar 05
> 00:21:40 2009"
> Does that mean my ASE is 15.0.3 ESD#1?
>
> So, is my ASE suitable for installing this EBF?


Sherlock, Kevin [TeamSybase] Posted on 2011-07-29 14:18:41.0Z
From: "Sherlock, Kevin [TeamSybase]" <kevin.sherlock@teamsybase.com>
Newsgroups: sybase.public.ase.general
References: <4e327726.2011.1681692777@sybase.com> <4e32bdbe$1@forums-1-dub>
Subject: Re: ASE15.0.3: is my ASE suitable for installing this EBF?
Lines: 27
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
NNTP-Posting-Host: vip152.sybase.com
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: vip152.sybase.com
Message-ID: <4e32c141$1@forums-1-dub>
Date: 29 Jul 2011 07:18:41 -0700
X-Trace: forums-1-dub 1311949121 10.22.241.152 (29 Jul 2011 07:18:41 -0700)
X-Original-Trace: 29 Jul 2011 07:18:41 -0700, vip152.sybase.com
X-Authenticated-User: teamsybase
Path: forums-1-dub!not-for-mail
Xref: forums-1-dub sybase.public.ase.general:30414
Article PK: 72592

correction on that link. It should be:
http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1038641

"Sherlock, Kevin [TeamSybase]" <kevin.sherlock@teamsybase.com> wrote in
message news:4e32bdbe$1@forums-1-dub...
> Yes, you can safely apply ESD4 over ESD1. For a definition of release
> terms, http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1092204 for example.
>
> <Henry> wrote in message news:4e327726.2011.1681692777@sybase.com...
>> Just received a vulnerability alert today:
>> http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1094235
>>
>> My ASE is version 15.0.3 on a Win32.
>> In the EBF list, there is only one suitable, but it says
>> it's for ASE 15.0.3 ESD#4. I don't know what ESD#4 means.
>>
>> If I execute select @@version on my ASE server, it displays:
>> "Adaptive Server Enterprise/15.0.3/EBF 16550 ESD#1/P/NT
>> (IX86)/Windows 2003/ase1503/2680/32-bit/OPT/Thu Mar 05
>> 00:21:40 2009"
>> Does that mean my ASE is 15.0.3 ESD#1?
>>
>> So, is my ASE suitable for installing this EBF?
>
>


Henry Posted on 2011-08-05 03:49:04.0Z
Sender: 391b.4e3a4f23.1804289383@sybase.com
From: Henry
Newsgroups: sybase.public.ase.general
Subject: Re: ASE15.0.3: is my ASE suitable for installing this EBF?
X-Mailer: WebNews to Mail Gateway v1.1t
Message-ID: <4e3b6830.4006.1681692777@sybase.com>
References: <4e32c141$1@forums-1-dub>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 10.22.241.41
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 10.22.241.41
Date: 4 Aug 2011 20:49:04 -0700
X-Trace: forums-1-dub 1312516144 10.22.241.41 (4 Aug 2011 20:49:04 -0700)
X-Original-Trace: 4 Aug 2011 20:49:04 -0700, 10.22.241.41
Lines: 30
Path: forums-1-dub!not-for-mail
Xref: forums-1-dub sybase.public.ase.general:30443
Article PK: 72621

Thx both of you. I successfully applied the patch :)

> correction on that link. It should be:
> http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1038641
>
> "Sherlock, Kevin [TeamSybase]"
> <kevin.sherlock@teamsybase.com> wrote in message
> > news:4e32bdbe$1@forums-1-dub... Yes, you can safely
> > apply ESD4 over ESD1. For a definition of release
> terms, http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1092204 for
> example. >
> > <Henry> wrote in message
> news:4e327726.2011.1681692777@sybase.com... >> Just
> received a vulnerability alert today: >>
> http://www.sybase.com/detail?id=1094235 >>
> >> My ASE is version 15.0.3 on a Win32.
> >> In the EBF list, there is only one suitable, but it
> says >> it's for ASE 15.0.3 ESD#4. I don't know what ESD#4
> means. >>
> >> If I execute select @@version on my ASE server, it
> displays: >> "Adaptive Server Enterprise/15.0.3/EBF 16550
> ESD#1/P/NT >> (IX86)/Windows
> 2003/ase1503/2680/32-bit/OPT/Thu Mar 05 >> 00:21:40 2009"
> >> Does that mean my ASE is 15.0.3 ESD#1?
> >>
> >> So, is my ASE suitable for installing this EBF?
> >
> >
>
>