Sybase NNTP forums - End Of Life (EOL)

The NNTP forums from Sybase - forums.sybase.com - are now closed.

All new questions should be directed to the appropriate forum at the SAP Community Network (SCN).

Individual products have links to the respective forums on SCN, or you can go to SCN and search for your product in the search box (upper right corner) to find your specific developer center.

createJavaInstance DLL vs PBD

2 posts in EJB Client Last posting was on 2007-03-07 08:58:59.0Z
bede Posted on 2007-03-05 12:46:39.0Z
From: bede <bedenosp@msofico.be>
Newsgroups: sybase.public.powerbuilder.ejbclient
Subject: createJavaInstance DLL vs PBD
Message-ID: <MPG.20562f5342caf57598987b@forums.sybase.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.70.2067
NNTP-Posting-Host: uu194-7-38-226.unknown.uunet.be
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: uu194-7-38-226.unknown.uunet.be
Date: 5 Mar 2007 04:46:39 -0800
X-Trace: forums-1-dub 1173098799 194.7.38.226 (5 Mar 2007 04:46:39 -0800)
X-Original-Trace: 5 Mar 2007 04:46:39 -0800, uu194-7-38-226.unknown.uunet.be
Lines: 16
Path: forums-1-dub!not-for-mail
Xref: forums-1-dub sybase.public.powerbuilder.ejbclient:727
Article PK: 424828

Using PB 10.5.1#6565

Anybody ever tried to build an ejbclient application with the option to generate DLLs?

The build itself takes much longer (expected), but when running it, JVM.createJavaInstance()
or ejbConnection.createJavaInstance() seems to result in a PBNI error.

I've tried with both the dynamic library checkbox on or off for the pbejbclient105.pbd in the
lib.list -> doesn't seem to make a difference.

Actually, i'm wondering what the advised setup would be when an application needs to be built
as DLL + optimized for speed.

TIA,

Ben


bede Posted on 2007-03-07 08:58:59.0Z
From: bede <bedenosp@msofico.be>
Newsgroups: sybase.public.powerbuilder.ejbclient
Subject: Re: createJavaInstance DLL vs PBD
Message-ID: <MPG.20589d48fc4511e9989888@forums.sybase.com>
References: <MPG.20562f5342caf57598987b@forums.sybase.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/2.70.2067
NNTP-Posting-Host: uu194-7-38-226.unknown.uunet.be
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: uu194-7-38-226.unknown.uunet.be
Date: 7 Mar 2007 00:58:59 -0800
X-Trace: forums-1-dub 1173257939 194.7.38.226 (7 Mar 2007 00:58:59 -0800)
X-Original-Trace: 7 Mar 2007 00:58:59 -0800, uu194-7-38-226.unknown.uunet.be
Lines: 20
Path: forums-1-dub!not-for-mail
Xref: forums-1-dub sybase.public.powerbuilder.ejbclient:728
Article PK: 424829

Case 11330420 opened

In article <MPG.20562f5342caf57598987b@forums.sybase.com>, bedenosp@msofico.be says...

> Using PB 10.5.1#6565
>
> Anybody ever tried to build an ejbclient application with the option to generate DLLs?
>
> The build itself takes much longer (expected), but when running it, JVM.createJavaInstance()
> or ejbConnection.createJavaInstance() seems to result in a PBNI error.
>
> I've tried with both the dynamic library checkbox on or off for the pbejbclient105.pbd in the
> lib.list -> doesn't seem to make a difference.
>
> Actually, i'm wondering what the advised setup would be when an application needs to be built
> as DLL + optimized for speed.
>
> TIA,
>
> Ben
>